Politics and gambling were front and center in the 2015 landscape. Hillary Clinton is the favorite to become the Democrat nominee for the 2016 presidential election, and her stance on gaming remains a little murky.
Politics and gambling are very similar in theory. Both involve strategizing and calculating, using odds into consideration, and deciding just how to proceed in the interest that is best of a person’s self.
When it comes to politicians addressing the issue of gambling, this issue becomes a little more technical. Lawmakers realize that casinos bring the probability of increased tax revenues that translate to additional monies that could fund state governments that are currently struggling in order to make ends meet.
Republicans and Democrats rarely agree with anything in today’s divisive climate that is political and when it comes to gambling, these hardened foes aren’t exactly yes where to face. Perhaps because online gaming, in particular, is neither liberal nor conservative, but a small amount of each, there’s no cut that is clear, no matter your party or viewpoint.
With all that in brain,we take a appearance right back on this past 12 months’s struggles with politics and gambling, and what seems to lie ahead in 2016.
The Race for 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
It’s shaping up to be Hillary Clinton versus the still-uncertain GOP nominee next November. Whether it’s Donald Trump, Dr. Ben Carson, Florida Senator Marco Rubio or any other Republican candidate, one thing is almost for certain, which is Clinton will be their opponent.
Hillary’s past when it comes to gambling is just a rather blended bag. Then-New York Senator Clinton voted in favor associated with the illegal Web Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) of 2006, a bill that essentially made online betting illegal.
Nevertheless, couple of years later, Clinton said she was in favor of investigating exactly how online gambling can be properly regulated. The front that is democratic hasn’t addressed the growing concerns of daily dream sports (DFS) as of yet.
The surprising GOP leader is unsurprisingly perhaps gambling’s bet that is best for expansion of casinos, both land-based and online. Being a casino that is former himself, the Donald will probably do little or nothing to block any federal legislation that could restrict states’ rights from deciding their own gaming laws and regulations.
Rubio has issued views that are rather contrasting gambling. The first-term senator co-sponsored the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in 2015, a bill that would outlaw all forms of on line gambling.
However, he also hinted this October that RAWA might need an amendment for Internet poker, as it has aspects of skill, but he’s remained steadfast against expanding gambling at land-based venues.
Dr. Ben Carson
The former Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon has remained quiet regarding the problem of gambling, and since he doesn’t have political or gambling background, their record is club player casino no deposit bonus vacant.
Speaker Paul Ryan
Though House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) isn’t an advocate for gambling or online casinos, he isn’t necessarily against the marketplace. The congressman that is nine-term not to vote on UIGEA in 2006 as well as decided to go with never to sign RAWA even though 21 of his Republican peers did.
The main one concern with Ryan among gambling supporters is he is hired Dave Hoppe as his chief of staff. Hoppe is a Washington, DC, lobbyist who has worked on behalf of billionaire Sheldon Adelson.
No guy ended up being more active in 2015 gambling that is political than billionaire and long-time GOP supporter Sheldon Adelson. The Las Vegas Sands chairman is no stranger to politics or Congress, and definitely knows what the expression ‘money talks’ is all about.
Worth approximately $30 billion, Sheldon’s made it his personal mission to ban online gambling enterprises using their governmental clout among GOP lawmakers to push RAWA in the Senate and House of Representatives.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) obliged and introduced the bill to their particular chambers, though it’s generated little action. Don’t expect RAWA to magically soon disappear anytime, the billionaire stating he’ll spend ‘whatever it will take’ to quit Internet gambling. But it does not appear to be threatening the shutdown of the three states that are legal either.
2016 will be a year that is important just due to the impending presidential election, but in part as a result of the rise of daily fantasy contests. The return of PokerStars to nj-new jersey will even bring added attention to online gaming.
RAWA in 2015: The Long and Winding Road That Led to Confusion and Contention
Billionaire Sheldon Adelson is funding the RAWA journey, and even though the legislation idled in 2015, the excursion will continue after the New Year. (Image: politico.com)
RAWA endured a long 2015 campaign when the legislation that aims to block all types of online gambling failed to gain momentum that is much Congress, despite several lawmakers advocating on its behalf.
Formally known as the Restoration of America’s Wire Act, RAWA was first introduced into the Senate and House of Representatives in March of 2014 by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).
The bill had been mainly overshadowed in Washington, DC, during its initial introduction as elected leaders inside the Beltway were focused on the so-called ‘cromnibus,’ a head-scratching emergency bill that finally funded the US federal government in 2015.
Graham and Chaffetz reportedly attempted to slide RAWA into the cromnibus package, but the bill ultimately passed free of any gambling legislation.
RAWA’s beat in 2014 don’t hamper its proponents’ motivation for this year’s legislative calendar. Supported by billionaire Sheldon Adelson, the $30 billion nevada Sands owner whom desperately wants online casinos outlawed, Graham and Chaffetz when again introduced the proposal to their chambers.
Chaffetz’s Hearing Aid
Carrying out a February presentation of RAWA, Chaffetz used his standing on the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations to put up a formal hearing on the pros and cons of giving Internet betting into prohibition.
The committee invited five witnesses to testify, but it was evident right away the majority was in benefit of RAWA. University of Illinois Law Professor John Kindt even stole line directly from Adelson when he said, ‘Click your phone, lose your property … click your mouse, lose your house.’
Just What coverage that is little RAWA hearing received was rather negative, media pundits pinpointing the bias among the invitees. That led to Chaffetz fundamentally failing to gain support that is much his House peers, RAWA basically being shelved into the aftermath.
Graham’s Bad Timing
Timing is everything, and Graham’s decision to re-enter RAWA in to the Senate arrived at what was perhaps the absolute most time that is ill-advised sc politician might have chosen.
On the day before nine victims of the Charleston, South Carolina, shooting had been set to rest, Graham quietly reintroduced RAWA.
Poker Players Alliance Executive Director John Pappas condemned the action saying, ‘we think I speak for most Americans when I express profound dissatisfaction in Senator Graham for selecting this time to advance a bill for the only real good thing about a billionaire political donor.’
Graham’s bill has sat quietly ever since, attracting more dust within the halls of this US Capitol than White House fourth-tier china.
The DFS Factor
RAWA is thought to have predominantly struggled in 2014 and much of the previous 12 months because the subject of online gambling simply was not relevant enough for middle-of-the-road politicians to tackle. But that might have changed now, thanks to daily fantasy sports (DFS).
DFS had been outlawed by Nevada and brand New York, and multiple other states are currently pondering the legality of the contests. Should Congress intervene, that could theoretically open the floodgates for additional gaming that is anti-online.
In Memorium, Nearly
Finally, both a House Oversight and Government Reform (OGR) meeting on Dec. 9th and a failure (once once more) to incorporate RAWA in an end-of-year investing bill means that RAWA may live to see a later date in 2016, but probably it’s going to be gasping for breath and on A adelson-funded heart-lung machine.
The 2015 On The Web Gambling State-by-State Review: Plenty Of Talk, Not Much Action
On the web gambling ended up being once again a topic that is active state and federal lawmakers, so that as the discourse continues, billionaire Sheldon Adelson continues his efforts to fight it down. (Image: Jeff Scheid/Las Vegas Review-Journal)
Online gambling earned lots of floor time in state capitols across the country’s 50 states in 2015.
The motion was fueled by a select few who believe legalizing Internet betting could provide revenue that is substantial for state tasks while also protecting citizens and adolescents from accessing rogue overseas sites. These legislators then persuaded colleagues to start an ear.
On the reverse side of the issue was effective vegas casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson funding political action committees and pressuring federal lawmakers to stop the market that is growing.
The dubious subject of ending prohibition that is online 47 of the 50 states was often discussed, but never caused it to be out of the park. Here is a state-by-state recap of what happened over the final 12 months.
Who Did What
Ca: The Golden State would offer a useful boost to on-line poker and Web gambling, but America’s many populated state idled regarding its passage in 2015. Several bills were introduced, nonetheless a complicated battlefield between lawmakers, Native Americans, and racetracks generated deadlock.
Pennsylvania: The Keystone State appears poised to become the 4th state with legalized iGambling in 2016. Led by State Rep. John Payne (R-District 106), the Republican-controlled legislature might need to legalize in purchase to combat Democrat Governor Tom Wolf’s increased investing.
Texas: The sun seems to be rising regarding online gambling in the state for which poker’s most popular game was named. In late October, the Texas lottery reached out to Delaware to learn more about its market. Congressman Joe Barton (R) has long been in support of legalizing iPoker, and it appears to be gaining energy.
Massachussetts: No state did more regarding gambling at land-based casinos in 2015 than Massachusetts. The Plainridge Park Casino opened in and the MGM Springfield and Wynn Everett are under construction june. But online gambling stays a no-go for the present time.
New Hampshire: In April, state lawmakers heavily shot down yet another bill to authorize casinos that are land-based. iPoker fans in the ‘Live Free or Die’ state have little to be excited about, charitable poker games also drawing scrutiny in 2015.
Wisconsin: Badgers will continue waiting to play poker outside a Wisconsin judge upholding the state’s poker ban by citing a 1964 ruling.
Michigan: The Spartan State has a long history of brick-and-mortar gambling, but that isn’t the way it is with online casinos. A Michigan State University study discovered that the continuing state would benefit from legalizing the industry, but lawmakers have been weary to proceed.
Nevada and Delaware: Two states that legalized online gaming before 2015, Nevada and Delaware attempted to breathe life into their struggling iPoker networks by formally launching a compact that is interstate. The pact hasn’t solved the issues of player liquidity as hoped, but.
Florida: The Sunshine State is definitely targeted by commercial casino operators for its high populace of seniors, but elected leaders have repeatedly knocked down attempts to lessen the monopoly on gaming native tribes have. On the web gambling appears to be an even longer shot for passage.
September New Jersey: The only other state with Nevada and Delaware to offer legal and regulated online gaming, New Jersey has its market positioned for a monstrous 2016 after it granted PokerStars an operating license in late. The Garden State is also trying to legalize traditional sports betting, a lawsuit set to be heard in February of the following year.
Brand New York: The Empire State was operating towards its authorization that is own of gambling in 2015 until day-to-day fantasy sports (DFS) exploded. With numerous bills presented, all gaming legislation took a seat that is back New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman pushed to make DFS unlawful in his state. Which brings us to…