The House Oversight and Government Reform (OGR) Committee listened to opinions on the Restoration of America’s Wire Act on Wednesday, the time that is second has been the topic of a House hearing.
RAWA gets around more, yet remains as unloved, as that one girl you went to school with.
AKA the Restoration of America’s Wire Act, RAWA was heard in the House of Representatives on during an Oversight and Government Reform (OGR) session titled, ‘A Casino in Every Smartphone: Law Enforcement Implications. wednesday’
(We’re uncertain when they were making a play in the old Herbert Hoover slogan ‘A Chicken in Every Pot’ with that session name, but choice that is interesting anyway.)
Four witnesses brought their supposed expertise to Washington, DC, to testify on Rep. Jason Chaffetz’s (R-Utah) legislation that would restore the Wire Act to its pre-2011 interpretation. Four years back, the Department of Justice ruled that the pre-Internet 1961 law that is federaln’t necessarily prohibit online gambling, effectively opening states to legalize online casinos.
‘We’ve had attorneys that are numerous, numerous governors saying, ‘You can’t do that to your state,” Chaffetz said in their remarks. ‘ You just don’t unilaterally change the statutory law having an OLC (Office of Legal Counsel) opinion.
‘ That poses a problem for lots of states. States which have legalized gambling, states like myself [sic] that have no video gaming, and do not desire to own any gaming,’ Chaffetz declared.
‘ The interpretation of the Wire Act has become a concern before 2011 plus it continues to be a question now,’ State Senator Mark Lipparelli (R-Nevada) testified. ‘You have situation now where you have old law which hasn’t kept up with innovation.’
Lipparelli ended up being instrumental in bringing on-line poker to Nevada, as he formerly served while the chairman of the Nevada Gaming Control Board. Throughout the RAWA hearing, Lipparelli was routinely called upon to defend legalization, which he did successfully, according to many observers.
Lost throughout the hearing had been a central understanding of what constitutes ‘legal online gambling’ versus ‘illegal on the web gambling’.
FBI Assistant Director for the Criminal Investigative Division Joseph Campbell provided several instances where his division has infiltrated criminal syndicates, concealing their identity online to launder money. However, when asked to provide accounts of any currently legal and regulated gambling operator’s transgressions into the same vein, Campbell said he could not furnish such examples.
Republican South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson swore that their state’s experience with land-based video poker was a massive negative, and that ‘gambling addictions proliferated exponentially.’
‘Despite South Carolina’s continued best efforts over the years to protect our residents from the threats posed by gambling, the Department of Justice’s revised interpretation of this Wire Act has opened the doorway to Web gambling, potentially turning any mobile device within our state as a virtual casino.’
Nebraska attorney Donald Kleine then also expressed concerns about states gambling that is legalizing computers and smartphones. ‘Online gambling easily crosses domestic and worldwide boundaries and can often be accessed by anyone with online access,’ Kleine explained.
Location, Location, Not Just Location
A shared trepidation among RAWA supporters is that present technology cannot accurately identify the whereabouts of the individual trying to enter a casino that is online. ‘ I think it’s naïve at best to think a wall can be put by you on the Internet,’ Chaffetz stated.
But Chaffetz, whom also serves since the OGR chair, said his concerns are even more than simply location.
‘Location is … a core part of it, but it also is due to your age, it offers to do with your intoxication (level), it has to do with a host that is whole of,’ Chaffetz detailed.
Rep. Gary Palmer (R-Alabama) also voiced fears about an adolescent finding a your hands on a smartphone with a casino app losing and installed the adult owner’s whole bankroll. Lipparelli responded by declaring that such a concern is not particular to online gambling, and so it’s no longer dangerous, or simply even less dangerous due to regulated iGaming controls, than a youth receiving a credit card and going crazy shopping on the internet.
Those that did attend seemed apprehensive in voting to have Congress get involved with deciding the fate of online gambling for all 50 states though the majority of the 43 OGR committee members skipped the RAWA discussion.
OGR Website Censored
Viewers are able to watch the RAWA conversation in its entirety on the OGR website, or watch three carefully chosen excerpts posted below the hours-long session.
Though the conference ended up being lively and well-rounded, the 3 clips on the OGR website appears to highlight the best exchanges of primarily RAWA proponents.
Chaffetz’s entire inquiry, which was supposed to be limited to 5 minutes, but ran for over nine, is available for viewing in its entirety. As are comments from Wilson as he recounts an account where a child that is young in a hot car outside a casino as the mother compulsively gambled inside.
Palmer’s questioning, including his opinion that gambling goals the poor, can also be watched. Palmer was one of, or possibly the sole, representative in attendance that came across like in support of RAWA, besides bill sponsor Chaffetz, of course.
Meyer Lansky Heirs Seek Compensation Claim for Cuban Casino
Meyer Lansky, ‘the Mob’s Accountant,’ who fled the Cuban Revolution, leaving his Havana casinos behind him. (Image: museumsyndicate.com)
When Meyer Lansky built the Habana Riviera Hotel and Casino in 1957, Havana was swinging.
It ended up being, at the time, the largest purpose-built hotel on earth and Ginger Rogers played on the night that is opening.
Lansky complained that while Rogers could ‘wiggle her ass’ she ‘couldn’t sing a goddam note,’ but the popular Jewish mobster was pleased enough.
After all, times had been good: he’d installed himself in the presidential suite and within 1st 12 months he would make $3 million from his brand new project.
But revolution ended up being in the air, and in 1959 Lansky was forced to flee the country, as was his great friend, the dictator and President of Cuba Fulgencio Batista, under whose patronage the United states Mafia had flourished in Cuba.
Lots of Havana’s casinos were damaged in the looting and fighting as Castro’s forces swarmed into town. In 1960 all of Cuba’s hotels had been nationalized and gambling became unlawful.
The entranceway is Open
But, history concept aside, now that the usa has restored diplomatic ties with its old foe, there is talk of honoring 50-year-old legal claims relating to the brand new confiscation of property, and Lansky’s heirs believe they will have a claim on the Riviera.
Gary Rapoport, a industrial propane salesman from Florida and Lansky’s grandson, says that their mother, his uncle and he, as beneficiaries of Lansky’s trust, should be eligible to some sort of compensation.
‘The hotel was taken from my grandfather forcefully,’ he told NBC Miami. ‘Cuba owes my family money.’
‘Trust me,’ he proceeded, ‘I’m maybe not searching to move down to Cuba and take the business over. I believe my children is entitled to something.
‘ We never filed a claim with the national federal government or hired an attorney earlier because we did not think the doorway for negotiating would ever actually available. Now it really is open’
‘ Governments change their mind on a complete lot of different things. I’m looking at it as a businessman,’ he added.
Did Lansky Die Broke?
Meyer Lansky, dubbed the Mob’s accountant, ended up being a teenage friend of Bugsy Siegel and Charles ‘Lucky’ Luciano who does later become the relative mind of the Genovese Crime Family. He began his career, with Siegel, operating a bootlegging that is violent during Prohibition, but eventually developed a gambling empire that stretched across the world.
Despite a lifelong career in prepared crime, he was never convicted of anything even worse than illegal gambling.
Lansky invested hugely in Cuba, and he was cost by the revolution millions. When he died, in 1983 of lung cancer, aged 80, he was ostensibly broke, although the FBI believed he had squirreled away some $300 million into overseas bank reports.
It’s unclear whether his family does have a claim on the Riviera. The revolutionaries of 1959 were furious using the corruption of the Batista government and particularly with the real way the dictator had sold off land and assets towards the United states Mafia.
Court Bars DraftKings and FanDuel from Operating in New York
Justice Manuel Mendez, whom sided with brand New York Attorney General Schneiderman and granted an injunction against DraftKings and FanDuel today. (Image: uptowncollective.com)
DraftKings and FanDuel have actually suffered a blow that is huge their appropriate battle to continue to operate in hawaii of the latest York.
A judge granted the injunction sought by the New York Attorney General’s Office that prevents the operators from taking bets from New Yorkers for the duration of the case today.
FanDuel agreed to suspend its operations in the continuing state before the outcome of today’s hearing, while DraftKings had defiantly continued to just take bets, but must now cease to do so.
The signs are ominous for the sites; the court would be unlikely to grant the injunction without strongly favoring the position of the attorney general while this is not the end of the lawsuit between the daily fantasy sports operators and New York.
The litigation escalated in mid-November when AG Eric Schneiderman wrote cease and desist letters to your two sites informing them that their operations constituted ‘illegal gambling’ under ny legislation.
Both sites launched legal action against the AG’s office in order to challenge the opinion and protect their business in the state while New York’s DFS fans protested on the streets.
They also launched an unsuccessful request for a short-term restraining order to avoid Schneiderman from issuing the injunction that was given today.
Lawyers for the websites spent several hours at a New York Assembly hearing on DFS on Tuesday arguing that the practice was a game of skill and that transparency and player protection had been vital to the industry.
‘ We want to work with you to ensure that fantasy contests are appropriate, safe for consumers, and continue to give you the great entertainment value that has driven our growth over the previous few years,’ FanDuel’s counsel for policy and government affairs Cory Fox told put together lawmakers in Albany.
‘ We believe that the path that is best forward for the dream sports industry is always to create regulatory solutions that will allow the an incredible number of users who love dream sports to play.’
Something of Value
But today in court the question that is simple Justice Manuel Mendez was required to answer had been whether setting a DFS line-up is just a skill or a wager. It is, he answered, the latter.
The sites’ lawyers had argued that since they were not taking ‘wagers’ but entry charges DFS could not be viewed as gambling under state law, a disagreement that Mendez dismissed.
‘New York State penal legislation does maybe not refer to ‘wagering’ or ‘betting,’ rather it states that a person, ‘risks one thing of value,” he said. ‘The payment of a ‘entry fee’ as high as $10,600 on one or more competitions daily could certainly be deemed risking ‘something of value.”