Some say this brand new ‘gaming equals gambling’ ad by the SA federal government goes too far
Set aside that new Xbox One or PS4 it might just turn you in to a gambler that is compulsive. That could not have been the message that the South Australian Government had been shooting for when they created their latest anti-gambling campaign, but it is the one that many gamers from Australia and around the world are taking away from it, especially considering that state’s previous stances that were seen as anti-gamer.
Gambling Is No Game
The new campaign is called Gambling isn’t any Game, and based on what the SA Government has said in the past, it appears to have a fairly well-intentioned meaning behind it. The idea is that children whom play games that include gambling elements like slot machines or poker games may be more likely to take up gambling habits later in life, or develop gambling problems even in their adolescence.
But the last product provides a somewhat different message. An image of a poster from the campaign was spread over the Internet this week, showing a lady searching at an iPad while sitting at what appears to become a poker dining table, complete with chips and cards. Above her there is an ominous message: ‘Gambling starts with games.’
While the idea could be to particularly target games with gambling content, the poster immediately delivered gamers around the planet into an uproar, because it generally seems to be connecting gaming in basic to problem gambling.
‘we would like to express we’re astonished at this type of buzz from South Australia, but it’s unfortuitously a lot more of the same unsubstantiated moral panic that we have become used to,’ stated Ron Curry, CEO regarding the Interactive Games and Entertainment Association.
Strict, Stricter, Strictest
Which may look like an overreaction if it weren’t for previous actions by the SA national. For example, South Australia was one of the major holdouts in incorporating A r18+ classification for video and computer games in Australia. Past for this classification, the rating that is highest available for games was MA15+; any game that could happen rated R18+ was affectively banned from sale, as it was ‘Refused Classification.’ The new category was eventually agreed in by every state attorney general, and the R18+ classification was introduced during the start of 2013, which has greatly reduced the amount of prohibited games in Australia.
South Australia still maintains their own Classification Council that can rate games separately for sale in the state. That plays a important part in the new campaign, as the SA government plans to introduce rules that will require games with simulated gambling content to be classified as MA15+ (or potentially other regulated classifications). This may affect a surprisingly high number of games, as even unassuming games like some in the Pokemon show have featured slot that is in-game. MA15+ games can’t be bought or played by those beneath the age of 15 with no direction of a guardian or parent.
These aren’t truly the only steps being taken by the South government that is australian part of their kiddies, Technology and Gambling policy. Other initiatives are the creation of a Watch List that will inform parents about games and apps that have gambling content, an emphasis on teaching ‘cyber safety’ in schools, and a push to own simulated gambling be used as being a factor in rating classifications at the federal degree.
Massachusetts Gaming Commission Okays Revere Vote While Caesars Sues
In the latest episode of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission hearings, Revere gets a shot and Caesars sues an associate
Suffolk Downs may well have their modified casino plan approved by Revere voters but the state of Massachusetts isn’t taking their word for it. The gambling commission announced this week they’re prepared to allow a Revere-only form of the Suffolk Downs casino plan to go forward, but only if race track/partner Mohegan Sun is willing to enable Revere to vote once again this time on the proposal that is new.
New Hope for Suffolk Downs
That choice is largely a win for Suffolk Downs, which saw its hopes of an East Boston casino dashed on November 5. Voters there soundly rejected their casino proposition, which would have had all of the buildings that are major parking facilities situated in Boston. Nevertheless, Revere voters additionally went along to the polls that day the proposed casino could have bordered Revere, and some small components of the facility might have been in their town and overwhelmingly approved the plan that is same making a gluey situation for regulators.
That offered Suffolk Downs the idea of transferring the casino that is entire Revere, one thing Revere seemed rather happy to accommodate. But as numerous Boston officials argued, which wasn’t what the votes had approved on election day, plus it was not fair to assume they would be ok with A revere-only casino.
The Massachusetts state gambling payment finally consented with this, voting unanimously to allow a referendum that is new be held. Suffolk Downs will have seven times to choose whether or perhaps not to accept this decision, with Suffolk Downs COO Chip Tuttle stating that they will likely do this.
Beneath the brand new proposal, Suffolk Downs would act as the landlord for the new casino property, while Mohegan Sun would build, very own, and run the casino it self. The facility that is new be independent for the race track, which Suffolk Downs says would continue its current horse-racing operations.
Caesars Sues Commission Chair
Meanwhile, Caesars Entertainment the original partner for Suffolk Downs features its own group of issues with the Massachusetts Gaming Commission. Caesars was originally likely to be the partner for the East Boston casino project, but was dropped by the competition track after state regulators raised issues over the company’s suitability, predicated on strange allegations of a relationship with another hotel team Gansevoort and a third-party to their dealings who was simply reported to have had dealings with a Russian mob figure.
Now, Caesars has filed a lawsuit against gaming commission chairman Stephen Crosby, stating that he had a prospective conflict of interest that he failed to disclose in a timely manner. This conflict of great interest, they do say, affected the fairness and objectivity of the state’s review of their suitability as a gambling operator.
Crosby said earlier this week which he made all the necessary disclosures about his friendship and former business dealings with a co-owner of land that is designated for use in an Everett casino proposal by Wynn Resorts. Crosby said he would recuse himself from a review of the land deal involving Paul Lohnes, whom Crosby says he has understood since the 1970s.
Caesars, however, says that Crosby’s disclosures to Governor Deval Patrick and the state Ethics Commission had beenn’t sufficient. The Wynn proposition would have to compete straight against a Suffolk Downs plan for the casino that is only in eastern Massachusetts, and thus eliminating Caesars from the competition would help the Everett proposition’s chances of gaining that license.
The Caesars lawsuit also alleges that they were held up to a standard that is different other casino operators who were bidding for licenses in the state. The recommendation that Caesars ultimately led to Suffolk Downs parting ways using them as a casino partner, as well as the ensuing confusion may are the determining factor in East Boston voters rejecting the casino plan.
Social Casino Index Shows Women Bet More Money that is virtual than
Brand New data from the Social Casino Index shows women that are american more than men online, but just when it is play money.(Image: Getty)
Females in the U.S. bet 30 percent more on online social casinos than men, which is astonishing news since typically males are linked more to gambling than women. Of course, they’re only betting with Monopoly money, so it’s easier to bet large.
The interesting data was recently released by International Game tech (IGT), a world leader in gaming systems technology, and DoubleDown Casino, which can be the biggest social casino in the world.
Social casino web sites are categorized as those which are on offer via social media web sites and present players the chance to play casino that is non-wagering including poker, roulette and slots. The very first ever Social Casino Index released jointly by the 2 companies has used the statistics from a lot more than six million people who play the DoubleDown Casino games on Facebook via their computer or device that is mobile month.
Middle-Aged Women Lead the Play Money Pack
The statistics showed that women are ahead of men in gaming activities and gambled more virtual chips each session, with those involving the ages of 45 and 55 yrs . old being the primary players. These women are also more likely to bet big, as men seemed to not bet higher than 7.6 million chips that are virtual session, whereas women had been willing to rise to 10 million whenever they played.
‘Due to the fact earth’s largest social casino, we are often seeing to better understand our players and their preferences,’ explained the vice president of international marketing at IGT Interactive Group, John Clelland. ‘The Social Casino Index provides gaming industry a truly step-by-step have a look at social casino player preferences for the first time. It is also fascinating to look to the similarities and distinction in our players from coast to coast.’
For instance, the personal Casino Index showed that more than 60 % of players in Nevada were women.
Across America, those surviving in Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Washington and Wyoming were more likely to try out at social gambling enterprises, since these locations saw the highest concentration of players in the united states.
Meanwhile, Hawaiians were found to be 20 percent more likely to relax and play on the move via mobile devices compared to the average off their states, and players from Maine had been discovered to be 25 percent less likely to play from a device that is mobile so obviously they choose to stay put while playing.
Gambling with Faux Chips
Into the real-money gambling globe, it’s generally accepted that men make up nearly all the pool of those with bad gambling habits. Also Clelland stated that IGT had the ‘belief that men would make the highest bets.’ But since women are topping the chart on social casino sites, these statistics will likely raise issues among those whom see digital money gambling as a route to real-money gambling.
Although the level has not yet been definitively calculated, numerous have already claimed that games which simulate gambling can result in real-money that is problematic practices, specially within the younger generation whom could become used to clicking away, seeing their numbers go up and down, without actually thinking about what they’re doing. The hope would be, of course, if they choose to try their luck on a real online casino that they make the distinction between virtual chips and real-money wagering.